I'm not sure how to reply - without going through your post, line for line. I have probably done too much of that already.
It seems you are using the word "spam" as an adjective - to you, an annoying message is spam (whether it is UCE or direct mail advertising DMA or a telephone call) and an acceptable message is not spam (whether e-mail or snail mail or a telephone call.)
To me, spam is a noun, and as such has a specific definition. The definition of spam includes that it is e-mail. Anything that is similar in other ways but is not e-mail cannot be spam - by definition. A table is not a chair nor a dog even though they all have four legs.
UCE and DMA (direct mail advertising) are both annoying and wasteful. You keep saying that you don't understand why people get upset over UCE but not over DMA. Well, I think they do. I do. And seemingly, you do. They are more or less equally annoying. But Doug didn't ask about DMA, he only asked about UCE. I have been trying to keep this thread on topic, so let me say now that I am equally intolerant of DMA.
More so, in fact - I hate the idea of chopping down a tree that took 20 years to grow and provided habitat for birds and other wildlife, that was sawn up and processed into paper, arrives at my door as advertising, is torn up without having been read and ends up in a landfill. 20 years of naure destroyed and sent to a landfill no purpose having been served whatsoever.
But that wasn't the topic of this thread (Or you would have really had an earful of me!!!)
Bookmarks